Romans 3 · Verse 8

Romans 3:8

And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.
Romans 3:8, King James Version

Romans 3:8 in other translations

BSBWhy not say, as some slanderously claim that we say, “Let us do evil that good may result”? Their condemnation is deserved!
WEBWhy not (as we are slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say), “Let’s do evil, that good may come?” Those who say so are justly condemned.
ASVand why not (as we are slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say), Let us do evil, that good may come? whose condemnation is just.
YLTand not, as we are evil spoken of, and as certain affirm us to say--‘We may do the evil things, that the good ones may come?' whose judgment is righteous.
DARBYand not, according as we are injuriously charged, and according as some affirm that we say, Let us practise evil things, that good ones may come? whose judgment is just.
BBELet us not do evil so that good may come (a statement which we are falsely said by some to have made), because such behaviour will have its right punishment.
WebsterAnd not rather (as we are slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.

What does Romans 3:8 mean?

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown on Romans 3:7-8

7-8. For if the truth of God, &c.--A further illustration of the same sentiment: that is, "Such reasoning amounts to this--which indeed we who preach salvation by free grace are slanderously accused of teaching--that the more evil we do, the more glory will redound to God; a damnable principle." (Thus the apostle, instead of refuting this principle, thinks it enough to hold it up to execration, as one that shocks…

Read the full comment on Romans 3:7-8 →

Barnes' Notes
Verse 8. And not rather. This is the answer of the apostle. He meets the objection by showing its tendency if carried out, and if it were made a principle of conduct. The meaning is, "If the glory of God is to be promoted by sin, and if a man is not therefore to be condemned, or held guilty for it; if this fact absolves man from crime, why not carry the doctrine out, and make it a principle of conduct, and DO ALL THE EVIL WE CAN, in order to promote his glory?" This was the fair consequence of the objection. And yet this was a result so shocking and monstrous, that all that was necessary in order to answer the objection was merely to state this consequence. Every man's moral feelings would revolt at the doctrine; every man would know that it could not be true; and every man, therefore, could see that the objection was not valid.

As we. This refers, doubtless, to the apostles, and to Christians generally. It is unquestionable, that this accusation was often brought against them.

Slanderously reported. Greek, "As we are blasphemed." This is the legitimate and proper use of the word blaspheme, to speak of one in a reproachful and calumnious manner.

As some affirm, etc. Doubtless Jews. Why they should affirm this, is not known. It was doubtless, however, some perversion of the doctrines that the apostles preached. The doctrines which were thus misrepresented and abused were probably these: the apostles taught that the sins of men were the occasion of promoting God's glory in the plan of salvation. That "where sin abounded, grace did much more abound," Rom 5:20. That God, in the salvation of men, would be glorified just in proportion to the depth and pollution of the guilt which was forgiven. This was true; but how easy was it to misrepresent this as teaching that men ought to sin in order to promote God's glory! And instead of stating it as an inference which THEY drew from the doctrine, to state it as what the apostles actually taught. This is the common mode in which charges are brought against others. Men draw an inference themselves, or suppose that the doctrine leads to such an inference, and then charge it on others as what they actually hold and teach. There is one maxim which should never be departed from: that a man is not to be held responsible for the inferences which we may draw from his doctrine; and that he is never to be represented as holding and teaching that which WE suppose follows from his doctrine. He is answerable only for what he avows.

Let us do evil. That is, since sin is to promote the glory of God, let us commit as much as possible.

That good may come. That God may take occasion by it to promote his glory.

Whose damnation is just. Whose condemnation. Rom 14:23. This does not necessarily refer to future punishment, but it means that the conduct of those who thus slanderously perverted the doctrines of the Christian religion, and accused the apostles of teaching this doctrine, was deserving of condemnation or punishment. Thus he expressly disavows, in strong language, the doctrine charged on Christians. Thus he silences the objection; and thus he teaches as a great fundamental law, that evil is not to be done that good may come. This is a universal rule; and this is in no case to be departed from. Whatever is evil is not to be done under any pretence. Any imaginable good which we may think will result from it; any advantage to ourselves or to our cause; or any glory which we may think may result to God, will not sanction or justify the deed. Strict, uncompromising integrity and honesty is to be the maxim of our lives; and in such a life only can we hope for success, or for the blessing of God.

(q) "Let us do evil" Rom 6:1,15

Albert Barnes, 1834 · public domain

Adam Clarke's Commentary
Verse 8 Apostle. And not rather, etc. - And why do you not say, seeing you assume this ground, that in all cases we should do wickedly, because God, by freely pardoning, can so glorify his own grace? This is a most impious sentiment, but it follows from your reasoning; it has, indeed, been most injuriously laid to the charge of us apostles, who preach the doctrine of free pardon, through faith, without the merit of works; but this is so manifest a perversion of the truth that a just punishment may be expected to fall on the propagators of such a slander.

Adam Clarke, 1831 · public domain

Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary on Romans 3:1-8

The law could not save in or from sins, yet it gave the Jews advantages for obtaining salvation. Their stated ordinances, education in the knowledge of the true God and his service, and many favours shown to the children of Abraham, all were means of grace, and doubtless were made useful to the conversion of many. But especially the Scriptures were committed to them. Enjoyment of God's word and ordinances, is the…

Read the full comment on Romans 3:1-8 →

Romans 3:8 in the original Greek

Word-by-word with transliteration, English gloss and Strong's number. Tap a number for the full definition and every place the word is used.

καὶkaiAndG2532
μὴmēsurelyG3361
καθὼςkathōseven asG2531
βλασφημούμεθαblasphēmoumethawe are denigratedG987
καὶkaiandG2532
καθώςkathōseven asG2531
φασίνphasinaffirmG5346
τινεςtinessome [that]G5100
ἡμᾶςhēmasweG3165
λέγεινlegeinto sayG3004
ὅτιhotithatG3754
ποιήσωμενpoiēsōmenLet us doG4160
τὰtathe [things]G3588
κακὰkakaevilG2556
ἵναinathatG2443
ἔλθῃelthēmay comeG2064
τὰtatheG3588
ἀγαθά;agathagood things?G18
ὧνhōnTheirG3739
τὸto<the>G3588
κρίμαkrimacondemnationG2917
ἔνδικόνendikonjustG1738
ἐστιν.¶estinis.G1510

Source: STEPBible TAHOT/TAGNT (Tyndale House, CC BY 4.0).

Cross references for Romans 3:8

  • Romans 6:1

    What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?

  • Romans 6:15

    What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.

  • Romans 5:20

    Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:

  • Romans 7:7

    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

  • 1 Peter 3:16-17

    Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ. For it is better, if the will of God be so, that ye suffer for well doing, than for evil doing.

  • Jude 1:4

    For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

  • Matthew 5:11

    Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.

Ranked by reader votes · OpenBible.info cross references (CC BY).

Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
we be.
Mt 5:11; 1Pe 3:16,17
Let us.
5:20; 6:1,15; 7:7; Jude 1:4

Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (Samuel Bagster, c. 1836) · public domain

Context

  • Romans 3:7

    For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?

  • Romans 3:8

    And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.

  • Romans 3:9

    What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin;

Read all of Romans 3

Romans 3:8 in other languages

Spanish
Reina-Valera 1909
¿Y por qué no decir (como somos blasfemados, y como algunos dicen que nosotros decimos): Hagamos males para que vengan bienes? la condenación de los cuales es justa.
French
Bible J.N. Darby 1885
Et non, comme nous sommes calomnieusement accusés et que quelques-uns prétendent que nous disons: Faisons du mal, afin qu’arrive le bien? – desquels le jugement est juste.
German
Elberfelder 1871
und warum nicht, wie wir gelästert werden, und wie etliche sagen, daß wir sprechen: Laßt uns das Böse tun, damit das Gute komme? -deren Gericht gerecht ist.
Latin
Clementine Vulgate
et non (sicut blasphemamur, et sicut aiunt quidam nos dicere) faciamus mala ut veniant bona: quorum damnatio justa est.